Method

How we compare

Version 2.10 · 25 October 2026

In short

For each offer we show what it costs and what's included, so you can compare them on the same terms. Each listing page, and the compare page, also shows how much of the offer is published.

If you think we've got something wrong, tell us. We check every correction against the operator's own pages and apply it promptly.

Offer details published

Each listing page shows "Offer details published: N of 22", with the list beneath it; the compare page shows the same count. The 22 are the details a buyer needs before signing: 21 from the operator's written terms, plus whether they describe hospitality for members. Each counts once, with no weighting. If the horse was bought privately, there's no sale record to cite, so that detail doesn't apply and the count is out of 21.

A detail counts when it is on the operator's own website, or in a document they give every member before they sign, or an official record such as their BHA registration, and they send us a copy. RSA membership also counts when we find it on the RSA's own published register, which we check ourselves rather than asking the operator. Anything they only tell us by email is shown on their listing as confirmed by them, but doesn't count. Each listing's "What's published" section ticks the details we've found. The rest are listed under "Worth asking", as questions to put to the operator. We haven't found them yet, which doesn't mean they aren't there.

The count describes what is published. It is not a verdict on the offer, the operator or the horse, and we never order offers by it.

What a year costs

Every way of pricing a share is turned into what a year comes to, per 1% of the horse owned or leased, so that a £54 share and a £5,000 share can be set side by side. An upfront price that buys a share for several years is spread over an assumed three-year racing life. Where an operator quotes a price plus VAT, we add VAT at 20%. Other prices are as the operator states them. We don't add VAT where the operator says it is reclaimed for every member. Each listing shows the figure, with how it was worked out, under "What it costs".

We don't label a price as high or low. Price reflects what an offer is: the trainer, the hospitality, the company you keep. So we give the typical range once, here, for each kind of share, and never on a listing:

Of the 41 syndicate shares we can work out a full year’s cost for, half cost between £430 and £570 a year per 1% owned (as at 1 November 2026).

We don't give a range for leases: we list 10, and a range needs at least eight whose yearly cost can be compared.

We don't give a range for racing club memberships: we list five, and a range needs at least eight whose yearly cost can be compared.

We don't give a range for partnerships: we list one, and a range needs at least eight whose yearly cost can be compared.

These ranges use each operator's published prices. Where an operator publishes only monthly payments, the range counts those alone.

The range is the middle half of those offers: a quarter cost less and a quarter cost more. It is worked out again every time the site is updated. There is no yearly figure where a year's cost can't be compared fairly: fees charged at cost, a payment that also buys the share with no later price stated, a fee that is still to change, or a racing club. The price is still shown as the operator states it.

We compare like with like

Before we compare anything, we label the kind of ownership on offer. These are genuinely different products, and the difference is easy to miss.

A £250 club membership, a £250 lease and a £250 syndicate share are not the same thing. Setting them against each other on price would mislead you. So we compare offers only with others of the same type.

We go by the legal structure, not the name on the door. Some businesses trading as clubs sell syndicate shares that give real ownership. Others use ownership words for a club membership. Neither is wrong, and neither is hidden: the answer is in the terms, not the title. So we take the ownership type from the operator's own terms and their BHA registration.

How the order works

For fairness, the order moves on every day, so every operator takes its turn at the top.

How the homepage picks its examples

The homepage is a taster, not the whole market. It shows two sections, jumps and flat. An offer appears only where we know its code from the operator's own words, the horse's racing or our own review. Jumps come first from October to April, and flat for the rest of the year. Each section shows three offers, at most one from any operator, using the same daily order. Each operator appears with its first offer that shows a price, by horse name, or its first offer by horse name if none shows a price. They are grouped by ownership type and never set against each other.

We never order offers by the published count, by price or by anything an operator does or doesn't do with us. Nothing an operator pays for, or says to us, affects whether, where or when it appears.

Year one is not the whole story

Most operators publish one number: what it costs to buy in. But where that price covers buying the horse as well as its keep, a second term usually costs much less, because the horse is already paid for. Other arrangements work the other way, with a low entry price and fees that keep coming. Either way, you often only find out after you've fallen for a horse.

So one of the offer details we look for is whether the operator tells you, before you buy, what a further term costs. It counts only where a renewal price or fee is stated: "cheaper", "at a lower fee" or "at prevailing rates" without a figure doesn't count. Where they publish it, the listing shows what they say. Where they don't, it says so plainly.

What we won't do is work out a three- or five-year total. Horses leave training through injury, retirement or sale. Renewal usually depends on the trainer's report at the end of the term, and many terms are only a year or two long. A confident-looking figure for several years would be a guess dressed up as a fact. We would rather show you what the operator has actually committed to.

What we read

We read every operator's own pages to the same depth. That means the home page, About, FAQ, How it works, Become an owner and joining pages, terms and conditions, and fees pages. It also means the operator's own terms document in any format, such as a PDF, brochure or flipbook, when their own site links to it.

We never take terms from blog posts, news, event posts or the shop. A horse's own page counts for that horse's listings only, never for the operator's other horses. Where that page is more specific than the operator's main pages, it applies to that horse. An example is how often that syndicate's members get updates.

We count what a buyer can reasonably find where an operator puts its terms. Reading everyone the same way means a listing never reflects how hard we looked.

Each page is read twice, independently. We record a fact only when both readings agree, or when Staibles has reviewed it. A listing's own offer, its price, share and availability, comes from the horse's own page.

Where a lot number is given, we check the identity of that lot against a published sale document where we can reach one. That means it is the horse described, by sire, dam and sex. We do not check the price. A sale catalogue lists what was entered, not what it made, and we hold no source that has both.

We use race results to check facts, such as an operator's winners to date. A horse's race record is shown on its listing as facts. We use no veterinary information of any kind. We make no inference about a horse's soundness or health, and we don't predict winners.

How we check a listing's key facts

A listing's key facts are its ownership type, share size, price, fees and term. We treat them as checked when each one was read from the operator's own pages and agreed by two independent readings. Staibles reviewing it, or the operator confirming it, also counts.

A listing can also come from one dated reading of the horse's own page, where it says shares are available. Whether the facts are checked yet says nothing about the operator. It plays no part in the order listings appear.

We read every listing's page again every week. If it no longer says shares are available, we take the listing down. If we can't confirm an offer for more than seven days, we hold the listing back until we can. A few websites can't be read automatically. We read those by hand at least once a month, and their listings show the date.

Anyone managing a syndicate or racing club needs a licence from the British Horseracing Authority. The BHA sets this out on its shared ownership regulation page. There is no public register of licence holders. So we show the position where an operator has shown it to us, and say plainly that it isn't established where they haven't. We never state or imply that an operator is unlicensed. A new operator with no winners yet is not marked as missing anything for saying so.

Corrections, disputes and changes

Who's included. Staibles aims to include every UK operator that sells shares. Some have asked not to be listed, and we've respected that, so not every operator is included here. Those we list can't choose which of their facts appear. Everything we find on their website is shown.

For operators

Your listing shows what your offer costs, what's included and how much of it is published. Publishing more fills the bar. A detail counts when it's on your website, or in a document you give every member, or an official record such as your BHA registration, and you send us a copy. Anything you only tell us by email is shown on your listing as confirmed by you, but doesn't count. Contact with Staibles changes nothing on its own: replying to us, or not, moves nothing. To correct anything, use the update form.

Change log

25 October 2026: version 2.10, the offer details count. Clarified how the offer details count works.

25 October 2026: version 2.9, questions worth asking. Facts not yet found now appear as questions worth asking the operator. No figure changed.

25 October 2026: version 2.8, where the count is shown. The offer details count now appears on listing and compare pages, not on tiles. Each operator's homepage example is now its first offer that shows a price, by horse name. No figure changed.

Show earlier changes

24 October 2026: version 2.7, how VAT is treated. Added: how VAT is treated. No figure changed.

23 October 2026: version 2.6, one payment that also buys the share. Corrected: where one payment covers the term and also buys the share, with no later price stated, a listing no longer shows a yearly cost per 1%, as this page says. Two listings changed, and the syndicate range now covers 48 offers.

23 October 2026: version 2.5, the base for the yearly range. Corrected: the yearly cost range now says how many offers it covers. Nothing else changed.

22 October 2026: version 2.4, who's included. Corrected: the page now says some operators aren't included at their request. Nothing else changed.

19 October 2026: version 2.3, sites read by hand. Most websites are read every week. Some can't be read automatically. We read those by hand at least once a month, and their listings show the date. The order offers appear in now moves on every day, so every operator takes its turn at the top. Nothing else changed.

13 October 2026: version 2.2, what a further term costs. This detail now counts only where a renewal price or fee is stated. A renewal described without a figure, such as "cheaper" or "at prevailing rates", no longer counts, so some listings show one detail fewer. Nothing else changed.

13 October 2026: version 2.1, no price labels. Listings no longer say whether a year's cost is below, around or above a middle figure: price reflects what an offer is, and a label beside it reads as a verdict. Each listing still shows what a year costs per 1% owned, and this page gives the typical range for each kind of share, worked out from the listings on every update. RSA membership is checked on the RSA's own register; the BHA doesn't publish one, so BHA registration is never shown as checked on a register.

12 October 2026: registers, and the middle figure shown. BHA registration and RSA membership now count when we find them on the BHA's or RSA's own published register, which we check ourselves rather than asking the operator. The line on what a year costs now shows the middle figure it is set against, for example "£535 a year per 1% owned". No rule or threshold changed.

12 October 2026: version 2.0, no scores. Scores and bands are no longer shown. Offers are compared on cost, what's included, and how much of each offer is published ("Offer details published: N of 22"), with a line saying where a year's cost sits against the middle figure for its kind. Offers appear in a neutral order: operators alphabetically, from a starting letter that moves on every Monday. This page is now How we compare. Entries below describe the method as it was then.

12 October 2026: describe, don't judge. The wording and order of our pages now describe rather than judge. Bands are shown as a letter and a range only, without names. A score now says what it is based on ("based on what we've found published so far"), not how confident it is, and a band shown below what the number gives says what would lift it. Operators' previews lead with what's in place, then what isn't published yet and how to add it. No rule, score or band changed.

12 October 2026: wording on members clarified, no rule changed. Operators can't promise an exact number of members, because people can buy more than one share. We score the most members a horse can have when every share is sold, so the questions and explanations now say that, instead of suggesting an exact count. No rule, weighting or score changed.

12 October 2026: a stated maximum now counts as this page says. This page has always said that where an operator states only the most members a horse can have, we use it as a stated worst case. Our scoring did that for some maximums but not others, depending on how we had recorded them, so some stated maximums counted as published but were left out of members per horse. That is fixed. No rule or weighting changed. Some scores moved: most by one or two points, and one listing that had too little information to score now has a score.

11 October 2026: clearer wording, no rule changed. This page has been rewritten in plainer English. The score's three pieces are now called areas, and how much each counts is its weighting. The table now gives the exact weightings, 31.7%, 28.6% and 39.7%, rather than the rounded figures the 18 September entry mentions. Each area now says what it covers, its weighting and when it isn't scored. We also corrected sentences that no longer matched the rules in use. A term we haven't found does lower the "What's in writing" count. A horse's own page counts for that horse. Three yard visits written into the agreement reach the top score. And the thresholds now include every score the rules give. No rule, weighting or score changed.

10 October 2026: the homepage is a taster. The homepage now shows two sections, jumps and flat, with three offers each, at most one per operator and scored offers first, and the operators shown change every week in turn. Offers covering several horses, shares whose code is still to be confirmed, and the operators we list but haven't scored yet are on the browse page. No score changed.

9 October 2026: a share count, and one-horse syndicates. Earlier the same day we stopped treating a number of shares as the number of members per horse unless the operator says the shares make up the whole horse, since others may own the rest. That was then refined: where an operator states, for one syndicate, both "number of horses: 1" and "number of shares: N", that is their own statement that the one horse is divided into N shares. One share is then shown as "1 of N shares in a one-horse syndicate", there are no more than N members per horse, and cost is compared per 1% of the syndicate's interest. It is never turned into a percentage of the horse unless the operator says the syndicate owns the whole horse. A share count on its own (a club, a syndicate with several horses, or no horse count) still says nothing about members or share size. The 15 listings it covers moved back by a band each, to the scores they had before the earlier change.

9 October 2026: the score you see decides the band. Scores were worked out to a decimal place and shown as whole numbers, but the band came from the decimal, so a score of 69.6 showed as 70 with band C. Now every score is rounded once to a whole number, with halves rounding up, and the band is worked out from that number, so the score and the band always agree. Nothing else about how scores are worked out changed. It moved 23 listings' scores or bands, 11 of them by a band.

8 October 2026: what counts as in writing. A fact now counts towards "What's in writing" when it is on the operator's website, or when we have seen it in a document the operator gives every member before they sign — a members' agreement, terms or a brochure — or in an official record such as a BHA register entry, and hold a dated copy. Something an operator only tells us by email is still shown on the listing, labelled "Confirmed by the operator by email", but it no longer counts. Before this, a fact an operator told us counted the same as a published one for some operators and not for others; now every operator is treated the same way. It moved nine scores, four of them by a band.

6 October 2026: this page reorganised. No rule changed. The page now opens with a short summary, uses one set of band names (A Outstanding, B Strong, C Fair, D Below par, E Weak), shows the shares of the score as whole numbers, and keeps every dated change here.

6 October 2026: we no longer score the horse. We had planned a second score, for the horse itself, and we have dropped it for four reasons. The dream of owning a racehorse is the same whoever you buy from; what varies is the deal, and that is what you need help comparing. For a horse that has raced, a score would largely restate its official rating, which is already public; for one that has not, it would rest on pedigree we cannot yet measure reliably. A verdict on someone's horse is the most sensitive thing we could publish, and it drifts towards tipping, which we will not do. And it is the same principle that removed price fairness: we show the facts instead of a verdict. We would look at it again only if buyers told us they wanted it.

29 September 2026: VAT. Where a price is stated plus VAT, we compare what a member pays, with VAT added, unless the operator says the VAT is reclaimed for, or repaid to, every member.

25 September 2026: no filling of gaps. We had planned to fill gaps with the market's middle figure once operators had been given a chance to answer, and tested three ways of doing it on every listing we held. Each one rewarded silence: the operators who publish things like members per horse and yard visits are mostly the ones who do them well, so the middle figure was a good score handed to anyone who said nothing. We changed the method openly, for everyone at once, rather than publish scores we knew to be unfair.

18 September 2026: from five parts to three. Two parts were removed. Price fairness, 22% of the score, never once produced a number on any listing we held. About half of those listings could never have produced one: a lease or a club membership conveys no share of the horse, so there is no value to compare a purchase price against. The rest depended on operators publishing what their upfront payment covers, which none of them did. More fundamentally, there is no source for what racehorses actually sell for: the sales companies publish their results as pages on their own sites and license nothing, race results carry no price of any kind, and an official rating tells you how well a horse has run, not what one costs. Without a market figure to compare against, any answer would be our own arithmetic resting on our own assumption. So we show the facts instead of a verdict: what the horse cost, where it was bought and the lot number appear on the listing where the operator publishes them, and count in what's in writing.

Operator quality, 15%, turned out to be measuring the same thing as what's in writing. Three of its inputs were disclosures under another name, and once those were removed what remained was, for half the operators we held, a single fact: an RSA membership or a company registration date. Neither is a record of anything an operator has done. Its inputs now count as items in what's in writing. If we ever hold winners and horses managed across a real share of the market, it should be looked at again as a part in its own right.

The three remaining parts kept their old shares, scaled up in proportion so that they total 100%: what a year actually costs 31.7%, what's in writing 28.6%, and what members get 39.7%. They are shown rounded, as 32%, 29% and 40%, elsewhere on this page. No operator's standing against another moved because of the scaling itself.

Back to top